- Posts: 25
- Thank you received: 8
Welcome to MMS Forum!
We encourage new members to post a short introduction of themselves in this forum category. Get to know your fellow board members and their interests and skills. Please come and participate in educating people about the healing miracle that is MMS, and join the movement to make it available to the World!
We encourage new members to post a short introduction of themselves in this forum category. Get to know your fellow board members and their interests and skills. Please come and participate in educating people about the healing miracle that is MMS, and join the movement to make it available to the World!
CDS VERSUS MMS
- rsbackus
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
10 Jul 2012 15:47 #19729
by rsbackus
CDS VERSUS MMS was created by rsbackus
In the recently emailed video about the Genesis II Church Outreach in Arhuaco, I see that in this wonderful expedition that CDS was used to a considerable extent.
That raises, again, the question of how can we decide when to use CDS versus MMS?
Has our Church reached conclusions about this question which we as Health Ministers can use to guide our ministrations to those in need?
Certainly, CDS is more palatable, but we also know that it lacks efficacy in some circumstances e.g. malaria treatment.
My simplistic understanding is that CDS is more reactive, and therefore best used topically; whereas, MMS, being, as Andreas said, a cloud reaction of longer duration - is more effective longer term and can therefore reach further into the body.
Clarification would certainly help all of us who hope to provide the best possible health benefits.
Sincerely,
Rev Richard Backus
That raises, again, the question of how can we decide when to use CDS versus MMS?
Has our Church reached conclusions about this question which we as Health Ministers can use to guide our ministrations to those in need?
Certainly, CDS is more palatable, but we also know that it lacks efficacy in some circumstances e.g. malaria treatment.
My simplistic understanding is that CDS is more reactive, and therefore best used topically; whereas, MMS, being, as Andreas said, a cloud reaction of longer duration - is more effective longer term and can therefore reach further into the body.
Clarification would certainly help all of us who hope to provide the best possible health benefits.
Sincerely,
Rev Richard Backus
The following user(s) said Thank You: gosherrygo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Evanir
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 194
- Thank you received: 86
24 Aug 2012 03:10 #21780
by Evanir
Replied by Evanir on topic Re: CDS VERSUS MMS
Rev Richard Backus wrote:
"In the recently emailed video about the Genesis II Church Outreach in Arhuaco, I see that in this wonderful expedition that CDS was used to a considerable extent.
That raises, again, the question of how can we decide when to use CDS versus MMS?
Has our Church reached conclusions about this question which we as Health Ministers can use to guide our ministrations to those in need?
Certainly, CDS is more palatable, but we also know that it lacks efficacy in some circumstances e.g. malaria treatment.
My simplistic understanding is that CDS is more reactive, and therefore best used topically; whereas, MMS, being, as Andreas said, a cloud reaction of longer duration - is more effective longer term and can therefore reach further into the body.
Clarification would certainly help all of us who hope to provide the best possible health benefits."
Sincerely,
Rev Richard Backus
MY QUESTION: if R. Backus, who was trained at Genesis ll Church is not sure when to use de CDS or MMS, how are we beginners going to know?
What is the conclusion so far from the ones taking both for longer periods of time or from observation?
Thank you,
Evanir
"In the recently emailed video about the Genesis II Church Outreach in Arhuaco, I see that in this wonderful expedition that CDS was used to a considerable extent.
That raises, again, the question of how can we decide when to use CDS versus MMS?
Has our Church reached conclusions about this question which we as Health Ministers can use to guide our ministrations to those in need?
Certainly, CDS is more palatable, but we also know that it lacks efficacy in some circumstances e.g. malaria treatment.
My simplistic understanding is that CDS is more reactive, and therefore best used topically; whereas, MMS, being, as Andreas said, a cloud reaction of longer duration - is more effective longer term and can therefore reach further into the body.
Clarification would certainly help all of us who hope to provide the best possible health benefits."
Sincerely,
Rev Richard Backus
MY QUESTION: if R. Backus, who was trained at Genesis ll Church is not sure when to use de CDS or MMS, how are we beginners going to know?
What is the conclusion so far from the ones taking both for longer periods of time or from observation?
Thank you,
Evanir
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Macaddict08
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 543
- Thank you received: 471
24 Aug 2012 03:13 - 24 Aug 2012 03:31 #21781
by Macaddict08
Replied by Macaddict08 on topic Re: CDS VERSUS MMS
Evanir,
I use them BOTH the MMS & CDS together (3 drops MMS + 3 drops CDS) = 6 drops per hour, for 10 hours.
Get the best of both worlds !
I use them BOTH the MMS & CDS together (3 drops MMS + 3 drops CDS) = 6 drops per hour, for 10 hours.
Get the best of both worlds !
Last edit: 24 Aug 2012 03:31 by Macaddict08.
The following user(s) said Thank You: jbnet, Evanir, jescola
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.306 seconds